6/28/2023 0 Comments Nt wright the challenge of jesus![]() ![]() If this is a fair reduction, I side with Wright as I know no historians who do what Adams contends must be done. ![]() Adams contends that the subject matter (God) requires a method that makes access to God intelligible, and he contends Wright’s critical realism is not adequate to the task Wright has in his Christian Origins and the Question of God multi-volume series.īefore I get to Adams’ summary of Wright’s method, a reduction to where this conversation may well end up: Adams accuses Wright of not doing theology as I suspect Wright will accuse Adams of not doing history (or of being an idealist). ![]() Torrance, with brushes up against Karl Barth and Kierkegaard. Here is the big picture: NT Wright’s method is, as he explains it, the historical method and Tom calls his orientation “critical realism.” The adequacy of Wright’s version of critical realism for the task of theology is challenged by Adams, and he challenges it by appealing instead to the theological method for knowing God one finds in T.F. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |